Irregular Webcomic!

Archive     Blog     Cast     Forum     RSS     Books!     Poll Results     About     Search     Fan Art     Podcast     More Stuff     Random
Classic comic reruns every day
<   No. 2846   2010-11-11   >

Comic #2846

1 Caption: ==Mythbusters== The Copenhagen Interpretation
2 Jamie: Continuing our testing of myths related to interpretations of quantum mechanics, todays it's the Copenhagen Interpretation.
3 Jamie: This says that whenever an event has two different possible outcomes, it generates a superposition of states in which both outcomes have occurred.
4 Jamie: Only when the system is measured by an outside observer does the superposition collapse into a single outcome.
5 Jamie: To test this, we are going to reproduce the famous Schrödinger's cat experiment.
6 Jamie: I put this cat into a box containing a radioactive source which has a 50% chance of releasing a vial of poisonous gas and thus killing the cat.
7 Adam: So the cat is both alive and dead?
7 Jamie: Right!
8 Adam: In the same way quantum mechanics both explains stuff, but makes no sense whatsoever?
8 Jamie: Er, right.

First (1) | Previous (2845) | Next (2847) || Latest Rerun (2846) | Latest New (5380)
First 5 | Previous 5 | Next 5 | Latest 5
Mythbusters theme: First | Previous | Next | Latest || First 5 | Previous 5 | Next 5 | Latest 5
This strip's permanent URL: https://www.irregularwebcomic.net/2846.html
Annotations off: turn on
Annotations on: turn off

No, really, this is a serious argument used to discuss the philosophical implications of quantum mechanics.

In its simplest form, the Schrödinger's cat argument concludes that:

IF the Copenhagen interpetation of quantum mechanics is true, THEN beings not being observed by a sentient observer may be in an indetermined state of being partly alive and partly dead.
The obvious countering piece of evidence is that is patently ridiculous. So either (a) we live in a universe in which the patently ridiculous is in fact true, or (b) the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics is a load of bollocks.

I should also point out that the famous Schrödinger's cat experiment is a thought experiment, not an actual experiment in which people play around with cats and radioactive sources.

Not that that's going to stop Adam and Jamie.


2025-08-04 Rerun commentary: Reasons why nobody's ever done the Schrödinger's Cat experiment with a dog:

  1. The dog would eat the radioactive source.
  2. Barking to be let out collapses the wave function. (Everyone knows the dog's alive.)
  3. Cats just get into boxes. Ever try that with a dog?
  4. The dog would eat the geiger counter.
  5. If the dog was alive and dead, it'd still want tummy rubs.
  6. Dogs don't deal well with ambiguity. "Am I alive? Am I dead? Am I a good boy?!"
  7. Honestly, cats already exist like they're in some weird quantum state. Are they in the room or not? What side of the door are they on? Who knows?
  8. The dog would eat the vial of poison.

LEGO® is a registered trademark of the LEGO Group of companies, which does not sponsor, authorise, or endorse this site.
This material is presented in accordance with the LEGO® Fair Play Guidelines.

My comics: Irregular Webcomic! | Darths & Droids | Eavesdropper | Planet of Hats | The Dinosaur Whiteboard | mezzacotta
My blogs: dangermouse.net (daily updates) | 100 Proofs that the Earth is a Globe (science!) | Carpe DMM (long form posts) | Snot Block & Roll (food reviews)
More comics I host: The Prisoner of Monty Hall | Lightning Made of Owls | Square Root of Minus Garfield | iToons | Comments on a Postcard | Awkward Fumbles
© 2002-2024 Creative Commons License
This work is copyright and is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 International Licence by David Morgan-Mar. dmm@irregularwebcomic.net